[The Community 2: The Invisible Hand] Diverging Values of Residents in the 'Majority Bandwagon Game' Questioning the Definition of Fairness

In a video capturing key scenes from the wavve original drama 'The Community 2: The Invisible Hand', the cast members participated in a 'Majority Bandwagon Game' themed around 'fairness', revealing their respective values.

Strategic Choices Between Alliances and War Costs

Prior to the start of the game, the cast members discussed the setting of relationships between teams and cost issues. In the video, a cast member mentioned the possibility of a breakdown with a specific team, expressing the opinion that they must prepare for a situation where they have to face the Red Team if the hub expansion fails. While expressing a desire to maintain a symbiotic relationship to avoid situations where eliminations occur, they continued discussions on the need to make quick decisions to minimize damage if war costs increase.

"Equal Opportunity is Enough" vs. "Existence of Unfairness in Results"

As the full-scale 'Majority Bandwagon Game' began, the topic shifted to whether 'providing the same testing opportunity to everyone is sufficient to establish fair competitive conditions.' One cast member argued that providing the same testing opportunity, which offers a similar starting line within realistic conditions, is sufficient. He presented the logic that adding additional conditions could lead to another form of inequality.

On the other hand, opposing opinions were also raised. Based on his experience studying in the United States, one cast member agreed that if the goal is the same, the same conditions are fair, but questioned whether results can be considered fair just because the opportunities are equal. He expressed the view that one should be wary of the illusion of fairness, citing examples of taking ex post facto measures to compensate for a concentration of a specific gender when forming a group. He also added that when designing systems, supplementary measures are needed to help the majority of society by focusing on expanding the pie itself.

The Definition of Competition and the Relationship with Social Wealth

The discussion expanded into a debate over the essence of competition and social support. One of the cast members mentioned that since competition inevitably involves ranking, the definition of competition is that the results cannot help but be unfair. Furthermore, they shared opinions on the relationship between welfare and individual achievement, citing examples where social subsidies could diminish an individual's will to take on challenges.

Finally, an argument was made that the reason fair opportunity is needed is directly linked to the wealth of society as a whole. The cast member mentioned that placing people with good brains in appropriate positions is the way to grow the wealth of society as a whole, pointing out the realistic problem where differences in educational opportunities arise depending on the economic conditions of parents.